Otter.ai vs Notta (2026): live transcription or multilingual meeting notes?
Otter.ai transcribes meetings live, with summaries and action items for Zoom, Google Meet and Teams. Notta also transcribes and summarises meetings, with a strong focus on many languages, plus transcription of audio and video files.
| Otter.ai | Notta | |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | Free plan with limited monthly transcription minutes | Free plan with limited monthly minutes |
| Paid tier | Check official pricing; Pro and Business plans | Check official pricing; Pro and Business plans |
| Best for | Live meeting notes and searchable transcripts | Multilingual meetings and transcribing files and recordings |
| Standout strength | Live transcription and meeting summaries that join your calls | Language support and flexible file transcription |
| Watch out for | Accuracy drops with accents, crosstalk and poor audio | Meeting-bot features are thinner than Otter's in some setups |
Otter wins when meetings are the job: it joins calls, transcribes live and hands you a summary with action items, so you can stop taking notes. Notta wins when language or file work matters more — transcribing a recording in another language, or turning a pile of audio files into searchable text.
Test both on your own worst-case audio: a noisy call, a fast speaker, a strong accent. The tool that handles your real meetings best is the right one, and the free tiers are enough to run that test before paying.
Sources: official pricing pages and 2026 comparison coverage. Otter.ai listing · Notta listing