Gamma vs Pitch (2026): AI decks from a prompt or collaborative team decks?

Gamma and Pitch both make presentations, but they optimise for different moments. Gamma turns a prompt or document into a finished deck in seconds, with AI restyling and restructuring built in. Pitch is a collaborative presentation platform: beautiful templates, real-time teamwork and analytics on who actually watched.

Gamma's job is to kill the blank page. Give it a prompt, an outline or a document and it returns a structured deck in seconds — slides, layouts, images and text arranged for you, with restyling and restructuring built in when the first version is not quite right. That speed is why solo creators, founders and marketers reach for it: a pitch outline becomes a presentable deck before the meeting, a report becomes slides without an afternoon of formatting. It also turns the same prompt into documents and web pages, so one idea can become several formats without starting over.

Pitch's job is to make the deck a team effort. It is a collaborative presentation platform built around beautiful templates, real-time editing, brand controls and analytics that show who actually watched your presentation. Designers, reviewers and presenters work on the same deck at the same time, comments and roles keep the process organised, and the analytics tell you whether the audience engaged or dropped off. Its AI generation exists but is lighter than Gamma's prompt-to-deck engine — Pitch assumes a human team is doing the designing, and the software is there to keep them in sync.

Pricing underlines the split. Gamma Plus costs $9 per seat per month billed annually ($108 per seat per year), or $12 per seat per month billed monthly as the standard monthly rate, with 1,500 credits per month; its free plan gives 400 one-time signup credits and up to 10 slides per prompt. Pitch prices in euros, not dollars: Plus is €10 per month paying yearly with 500 AI credits per month, Team is €15 per month and Business is €20 per month, and no monthly-billed price is shown on the page. Pitch's free plan is generous in a different way — unlimited presentations and up to 5 members, with 100 one-time AI credits. One warning for anyone comparing old reviews: Pitch's former Pro plan no longer exists, so any price or feature list mentioning Pro is out of date.

Gamma's strength is pure generation speed, and its weakness follows from it: an AI deck is a first draft, not a finished presentation. Facts can be invented, layouts can be generic, and the deck needs a human edit for accuracy and taste before anyone sees it. Pitch's strength is the workflow around the deck — collaboration, templates and analytics that no solo generator matches. Its weakness is that it is slower to start: without Gamma-style prompt-to-deck generation, a new deck still begins with a template and a human. Pick Gamma when the bottleneck is starting; pick Pitch when the bottleneck is the team.

For a solo founder who needs a deck tomorrow morning, Gamma is the obvious pick — draft it there, edit it once, present it. For a marketing or sales team that presents together every week, Pitch earns its keep through shared decks, brand control and analytics on every presentation. Many teams use both: draft in Gamma, rebuild the keeper slides in Pitch for the team, and keep the workflow that fits each stage. If you are new to AI decks altogether, our guide to how to use AI presentation tools walks through getting a usable first draft without letting the AI invent your facts.

Sources: Gamma pricing · Pitch pricing · Gamma listing · Pitch listing